News | Editorial | Arts & Events | Satire 

Traffic Cameras for Safety or Profit?

Author: John Hawbaker
Filed Under: Government
Published: August 25th, 2008

A recent article on Ride Lust examined several studies of red-light cameras which found that they can actually decrease safety, increase the number of accidents and increase auto insurance rates. The studies reveal that traffic cameras do more to service city revenues than public safety. In fact, in six U.S. cities studied, including Chattanooga, yellow-light durations have actually been shortened on lights with cameras.

Apparently, the findings have been known for some time. A 2001 paper by the Office of the Majority Leader of the U.S. House of Representatives reported that red-light cameras are “a hidden tax levied on motorists.” The report came to the same conclusions that all of the other valid studies have, that red-light cameras are associated with increased crashes and that the timings at yellow lights are often set too short to increase tickets for red-light running.

In addition to the obvious revenue implications, traffic cameras can also serve as a tool to provide an illusion of greater security. There was a tremendous amount of “think of the kids” rhetoric swirling about before cameras were added to the Hixson S-Curves. But are the cameras actually making us safer? According to these studies, no.

What’s your take?

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis

Please review the Chattarati Comments Policy before posting.

Comments
  • I think that's an interesting take on the camera situation, and I actually agree. But, what does this study say are the facts behind it's conclusion?
  • @ Kevin: The post on Ride Lust links to deeper info on the research.
  • I think a lot of people are like me and focus more on the light than they do on the cars around them when approaching one of these cash-intake intersections. Normal focus when approaching an intersection should be on the cars around you, the chance that an emergency vehicle might need the right-of-way, etc. The light should be a much smaller part of your thought cycle. When approaching the cameras, however, the $50 ticket from running a redlight or speeding push the important things, like not getting plowed by a cement truck, to the back of your mind. Here's a hint about most everything the government tells you: if they tell you its for your own good, for safety, or for the children, its usually not.
  • Chris
    I have to say I am totally opposed to the cameras as they are being used now. While the speeds on the Hixson S-Curves are down considerably, they fail to control the real issue on that particular stretch of road: narrow lanes and no margin for error. I am far more concerned with drivers who fail to maintain their lane, than the particular speed they are driving.

    If safety were truly the reason the cameras were installed, shouldn't the city address the cause of the real problem, not the symptom?
blog comments powered by Disqus