Just after the launch of Chattanooga Stand, a new "visioning" initiative, we offered our vision as a challenge to Stand's organizers: become a model of radical transparency in Chattanooga. Yesterday, campaign coordinator Sarah Lester took the first step towards that goal by publishing financial data and strategic plans, as well as a list of board members, supporting organizations and pledged partners.
According to the site, Chattanooga Stand receives day-to-day guidance from a Board of Directors, comprised of Stephen Culp, Lisa Flint, Wade Hinton, Sarah Ingle, J.Ed. Marston, Josh McManus, and Karen Rennich. The Stand campaign is supported by seven staff members and a community roundtable of volunteers.
Rountable meetings, which are open to "hopeful and helpful" members of the public, are held every other Wednesday at 5:00 p.m. at Bluegrass Grill on E. Main St. The next meeting is scheduled for June 10, 2009.
The Board of Directors operates as an unincorporated association with an independent fund at the Community Foundation of Greater Chattanooga. According to the site, $500,000 has been pledged to support the campaign. An initial round of $330,000 in funding has already been secured from the Lyndhurst Foundation, and an additional $170,000 in funding is listed as "pending." Supporting organizations include CreateHere, The Ochs Center for Metropolitan Studies, La Paz de Dios, UTC, and Widgets & Stone.
Notably absent from the list is the Chattanooga Times Free Press, which covered Chattanooga Stand in a pair of front-page articles on May 3 and 4. Those articles prompted a letter to the editor by David Morton, arguing that the coverage "reads more like a coronation of future leadership rather than unbiased news accounts."
Ms. Lester explained that the TFP "partnered with [Stand] for the initial news break, editorial coverage and discounted advertising," and indicated she would update the site to appropriately reflect their ongoing support.
Full statement from Ms. Lester, Chattanooga Stand campaign coordinator:
Chattarati Editors and Readers,
Many thanks for your sharing your vision and pointing out the opportunity to create a deeper understanding of Stand's processes, people and partnerships. ChattanoogaStand.com's About page has been updated to include the information below. However, to directly address your points:
- Meetings. Every meeting is and will remain open to the public. Roundtable planning meetings occur every two weeks at Bluegrass Grille (55 E Main Street). The next meeting is June 10th at 5:00 PM. Come one, come all - what we expect of ourselves and anyone joining the conversation is to remain hopeful & helpful, part of & proud of.
- Technology. We're balancing constraints of limited time, financial and people-power. If you have the technology and the know-how for making audio recordings or live streaming available to the public, I'd love to hear from you.
- Strategy, Funding, Partners, Board & Roundtable. Please (re)visit the website's About page for in-depth information about our strategy for reaching 25,000 responses, our approach to funding and a better breakdown of the many people and organizations involved in Stand. If you want to delve even further, here's a link to the every-evolving Field Strategy my team is using.
- Data. Stand's stated goals are to seek input from thousands of community members through the survey and to make the results transparent and easy to access. After we've finished surveying the region, we plan to release the raw data to the public in a searchable digital format, along with an Executive report with the data results in tangible, useful bites. This is possible thanks to The Ochs Center for Metropolitan Studies and UTC's Center for Applied Social Research and Dr. Andy Novobilski, Chief Research Officer.
As Campaign Coordinator for Stand, I personally welcome your questions, concerns and challenges regarding the process itself - along with your input and idea about what's next for Chattanooga.
John Hawbaker
Strat Parrott on May 29, 2009
Not enough financial power? With $500k + let me loose with 1/3 of that and I'll implement some community re-visioning strategy.
CaseyTuggle on May 29, 2009
I agree, Strat. That is a sizeable chunk of change for what I assumed was just a well-marketed community volunteer effort. Apparently I haven't been watching the money trail.
Brian Davis on May 29, 2009
It's more than $500K. CreateHere got around 450K last year so it's likely roughly the same this year, plus 300K for MakeWork grants this year.
1.2 Million and change.
doodle on May 29, 2009
Sizable chunk that can dwindle quickly if not spent wisely. Don't think there would be any do overs.
twitter-15317689 on June 2, 2009
All things are relative, but the budget for Stand is well less than half of what visioning processes have cost in other cities (Calgary and Portland, specifically, neither of which had the scope of Stand). The planning group spent six months studying how to be most efficient and effective on this front, and that's the budget that we arrived at. Furthermore, the planning process remains open and the operating budget is adjusted as necessary to effectively meet the goal of 25,000 responses. We welcome all that wish to see the process through to a positive conclusion. Join in at the next planning meeting on Wednesday, June 10th at 5:00 pm at Bluegrass Grille.
Brian Davis on June 2, 2009
Both Calgary and Portland have over a million people in their city limits, Chattanooga has 170K.
1/6 the size, but 1/2 the budget.
The two question are:
Why do we need stand?
What specifically is that money being spent on?
Robert T. Nash on June 2, 2009
Q: What specifically is that money being spent on?
A: It's my opinion this specious little social engineering phenomenon exists for the same reason all such non-profit extravaganzas in this part of the world exist: To spread conscience salve while providing employment for well-connected insider types who would otherwise be starving, naked and homeless...
Bud Rose on June 2, 2009
Kinda like WGOW...
Robert T. Nash on June 2, 2009
Yeah, exactly - only with a profit motive, ratings and taxes paid on earnings...
Allison on June 6, 2009
Chattanooga Stand is the new River City, and make no mistake about it, the next mayor of Chattanooga will be from this group. The names are sooo familar. I get it.
jules on June 22, 2009
Are the meetings always every other Wednesday? So...is the next public meeting this Wednesday, June 24th at 5:00pm at Bluegrass Grille?
Jules
Allison on June 22, 2009
You betcha Robert T. The list of names are River City, Coulter, the Regional Planning Agency staff (the anti Littlefield ones), Create Here, the Echenthal, Berke group of the Ochs. A blind person could see this one!
I was not born yesterday, and jumped off the turnip truck years ago.
Little Napoleon on June 23, 2009
Hey RTN - Why don't you try something different for a change and enlighten us all on what YOU would do to make Chatt. a better place to live. And it would actually have to be constructive instead of something like GET RID OF ALL FOUNDATIONS, CLOSE THE RIVER CITY COMPANY, KICK OUT ALL THE TRUST FUND KIDS. It would be nice to hear your ideas for once instead of your blather.
Allison on June 23, 2009
It is very obvious that certain organization with 503c status have evolved into over paid jobs for friends, with a blatant political agenda. When a so calle 503c's have CEO's at $110k plus, hire all of their friends at salaries not typical for this area, and try to control political outcomes, these organization are a tax shelter for their own personal agenda. River City and Stand are the essence of this shelter for do gooder, with a real agenda. Finally, someone in the media is willing to tell it like it is!
Robert T. Nash on June 23, 2009
Little Napoleon,
Thanks for your input, such as it is. In new Business, I've got One-Hundred Bucks that says I can determine your true identity within seven days and publicly out you right hear on Chattarati. If I am succesful, you have to come on 'Live and Local' to discuss these very matters. What say ye?
RTN/XXX/OOO/666/365
mwillingham on June 23, 2009
You didn't accept Little Napolean's challenge.
Robert T. Nash on June 23, 2009
Typed the posuer...
Little Napoleon on June 23, 2009
Allison - All organizations, even nonprofit (501(c)(3) is what they are called) do things that are good and bad. That said, let's go back 30 years before any of this stuff happened. What would YOU have done to change the Chattanooga of the 1970's that was polluted, had nothing downtown but empty people, and was losing jobs?
Little Napoleon on June 23, 2009
Try answering my question first before you change the subject. Once you do that, go ahead and out me. If it's that big a deal to you then you don't need $100 as incentive.
By the way, don't you think it's a bit ironic that you spend hours and hours raging against the Lyndhurst Foundation and the "sugar water" that helped to create it and then have to advertise that you're serving Coke at your remotes?
Robert T. Nash on June 23, 2009
Little Napolean,
Thanks for listening to 'Live and Local' on Talk Radio WGOW 102.3 FM. Hvae you gone to 'Irresponsible Journalism' to look at the 'proof' - which I like to call evidence - you requested with respect to my assertion Josiah Q. Roe postred anti-Semitic remarks under my name yet?
RTN/XXX/OOO/666/365
Matthew Overby on June 23, 2009
getting juicy...
My bet is that little napoleon can't carry on this kind of correspondence while running a 3 hour radio show.
Little Napoleon on June 23, 2009
Can't find it. If you could provide a link I'd appreciate it. Be sure to let Sgt. Weary know you didn't spell posted correctly.
Allison on June 23, 2009
Surely Little Napoleon you don't credit River City with abating air quality
from the 1970's. As a former environmental regulator, I like to attibute the cleaner air and water to federal legislation and mandates, call the Clean Air Act. The planners at the Regional Planning Agency, and taxpayers who funded the vision. The notion that River City and the Lynhurst people caused the sucess downtown is sooo naive and represents the views of some. The taxpayers willingness to fund the vision cuased the sucess.
mwillingham on June 23, 2009
They didn't call the aquarium, "Jack Lupton's fish tank" for nothing.
Little Napoleon on June 23, 2009
It wasn't just the taxpayers who funded the vision, it was also those nasty horrible foundations as well. Are you saying the nonprofits had nothing to do with it??? And yes, there was vision that created the success - who do you think had the idea and facilitated bringing parties together to come up with the vision? Not the taxpayers, not govt, but those nasty horrible foundations. If you are saying that the process created success, then you are saying that the foundations were a part of that success. Not all of it, but a significant part. And yes, foundations are not all good, but if you can't say that they have done anything good for Chatt, then it's pointless for us to continue the discussion.
Jules on June 23, 2009
STAND isn't trying to solve the problem of an pollution ridden city and an abandoned downtown; it's trying to get 25K surveys. An equally honorable goal, for sure.
T-Minus 2 years until STAND executives take a job at a "thought tank" out of the City.
Sarah Lester on June 24, 2009
Jules,
My apologies for not catching your comment in time - yes, this afternoon at 5 PM at Bluegrass Grille was our most recent community roundtable meeting. Our next meeting is July 8th, same time, same place.
Hope you can join!
Best,
Sarah Lester
sarah@chattanoogastand.com